Flock Safety, a surveillance technology provider, is facing increased opposition as cities across the United States re-evaluate their contracts. Concerns about data access and privacy are leading to cancellations and policy changes, as reported by Analytics Insight.
This development means drivers should pay closer attention to where these cameras are installed and how their data might be used. FlockDetour's mission is to provide transparency, helping you understand the spread of automated license plate readers (ALPRs) and other surveillance technologies. You can always check our /map to see known camera locations.
What happened with Flock Safety's cameras in Boston?
Boston recently terminated its pilot program with Flock Safety due to issues with data sharing. The city had installed approximately 45 cameras. A setting error allowed external law enforcement agencies nationwide to access vehicle data captured by these cameras during the initial phase of the five-month trial. Boston's 2025 surveillance technology report detailed the problem.
The Boston Police Department conducted 11,004 searches during the pilot. An internal audit found that officers included a case number in only about half of these searches, prompting calls for stricter controls on how the data is accessed and used.
Are other cities canceling Flock Safety contracts?
Yes, a significant number of cities and counties have ended their agreements with Flock Safety. Data compiled by Secure Justice indicates that 214 US cities and counties have canceled contracts with Flock since 2021. This includes 90 cancellations in August 2026 alone.
Flock Safety's technology captures license plate information and other vehicle characteristics, adding it to a searchable network. While law enforcement agencies state the system aids in locating missing persons, recovering stolen vehicles, and supporting criminal investigations, critics are worried about potential misuse and prolonged tracking of vehicles. Flock Safety has responded by implementing new privacy controls and platform changes, allowing customers to restrict searches. The company also recently offered a voluntary separation program to employees.
This trend of cities re-evaluating and canceling contracts highlights the ongoing debate around surveillance technology and personal privacy. For drivers, it reinforces the importance of understanding the presence of ALPRs and other cameras in their daily routes. FlockDetour continues to track these developments and encourages community contributions to keep our map current. You can learn more about ALPRs and their impact on privacy at /learn.